In traffic arbitrage, when it comes to trust, you need to take all of your tools into account. The most trustworthy virtual card is unlikely to allow you to successfully launch a campaign if you do it from a fresh account and vice versa. Your card, account, proxy, browser, and so on — all the tools should have a decent trust.
You should test your virtual card exclusively with your complete set-up. The approach you choose is also vital for the success of the operation, therefore make sure to test your tools’ trust via different methods to avoid problems in the future.
Today, we’ll run four tests for four separate methods to showcase how it’s done. For each test, we’ll be using the following tools:
✓a FlexCard virtual card (USD, New York BIN),
✓a boosted King account,
✓Dolphin{anty} antidetect browser,
✓and a mobile proxy for the US.
Method #1
We are using the King account’s ad account. We link the card through billing manually and launch the campaign from the boosted account. Facebook asks for verification via code and hold confirmation, but at no stage is the Risk Payment error displayed. Great; moving on.
Method #2
Now, we switch over to the Business Manager’s ad account. Again, we link the card manually when creating our BM account and launch the campaign from the boosted account. FB asks for the verification and hold confirmation again, but does not issue the Risk Payment error. Basically, the same result as in the first case.
Method #3
This time, we’ll be using an American log for our campaign. It’s really simple: we link the log with our King account, link the card, and launch the ad manually. From this point forth, everything follows the proven scheme: hold and verification requests from Facebook and no Risk Payment error. Again, this method proves to be working.
Method #4
Finally, we switch to a cheap Moldovan autoregistered account. We link the card, launch the campaign as per usual, and it seems to work just fine, with no errors of any kind. Admittedly, we’re free to use any of the four methods with this set-up.
Conclusion
In all four cases, the card linked up without any issues, which means two things: firstly, the set-up was chosen competently; and secondly, the card’s BIN is about as trustworthy as they get, and we can use it without a worry.
Still, let us repeat ourselves: you can’t consider the trust of a virtual card in isolation from the rest of the set-up. You should test all the campaign launch methods with your set-up to ensure everything’s working as intended. It costs you money in the moment but saves you time, stress, and effort in the long run.
And to make sure you have a virtual card with the biggest trust possible, get yours on our website. We have quite a selection of BINs we’re sure you’ll appreciate, so click the link, place an order, and enjoy all the benefits with FlexCard! 💚
You should test your virtual card exclusively with your complete set-up. The approach you choose is also vital for the success of the operation, therefore make sure to test your tools’ trust via different methods to avoid problems in the future.
Today, we’ll run four tests for four separate methods to showcase how it’s done. For each test, we’ll be using the following tools:
✓a FlexCard virtual card (USD, New York BIN),
✓a boosted King account,
✓Dolphin{anty} antidetect browser,
✓and a mobile proxy for the US.
Method #1
We are using the King account’s ad account. We link the card through billing manually and launch the campaign from the boosted account. Facebook asks for verification via code and hold confirmation, but at no stage is the Risk Payment error displayed. Great; moving on.
Method #2
Now, we switch over to the Business Manager’s ad account. Again, we link the card manually when creating our BM account and launch the campaign from the boosted account. FB asks for the verification and hold confirmation again, but does not issue the Risk Payment error. Basically, the same result as in the first case.
Method #3
This time, we’ll be using an American log for our campaign. It’s really simple: we link the log with our King account, link the card, and launch the ad manually. From this point forth, everything follows the proven scheme: hold and verification requests from Facebook and no Risk Payment error. Again, this method proves to be working.
Method #4
Finally, we switch to a cheap Moldovan autoregistered account. We link the card, launch the campaign as per usual, and it seems to work just fine, with no errors of any kind. Admittedly, we’re free to use any of the four methods with this set-up.
Conclusion
In all four cases, the card linked up without any issues, which means two things: firstly, the set-up was chosen competently; and secondly, the card’s BIN is about as trustworthy as they get, and we can use it without a worry.
Still, let us repeat ourselves: you can’t consider the trust of a virtual card in isolation from the rest of the set-up. You should test all the campaign launch methods with your set-up to ensure everything’s working as intended. It costs you money in the moment but saves you time, stress, and effort in the long run.
And to make sure you have a virtual card with the biggest trust possible, get yours on our website. We have quite a selection of BINs we’re sure you’ll appreciate, so click the link, place an order, and enjoy all the benefits with FlexCard! 💚